Trump’s Attack on History at the Smithsonian

The Trump administration has launched a direct attack on the historical exhibitions at the Smithsonian Institution museums in Washington, D.C., opening a new front in the ongoing Culture Wars.

“The US president, who has sought to root out ‘wokeness’ since returning to power in January, accused the Smithsonian of trying to rewrite history on issues of race and gender. In an executive order entitled ‘Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History”, he directed the removal of ‘improper, divisive or anti-American ideology’ from its storied museums,” according to The Guardian.

Trump’s executive order claims that “Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology. … This shift has promoted narratives that portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive.”

“The move was met with dismay from historians who saw it as an attempt to whitewash the past and suppress discussions of systemic racism and social justice. With Trump having also taken over the John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, there are fears that, in authoritarian fashion, he is aiming to control the future by controlling the past.”

Historians across the United States are responding to President Trump’s executive order and its anti-democratic aims of establishing presidential control over the presentation of the history of the United States in the Smithsonian museums.

‘”It is a five-alarm fire for public history, science and education in America,’ said Samuel Redman, a history professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. ‘While the Smithsonian has faced crisis moments in the past, it has not been directly attacked in quite this way by the executive branch in its long history. It’s troubling and quite scary,'” according to The Guardian.

The National Museum of African American History and Culture seems to be at the center of the Trump administration’s assault on historical education. Lonnie G. Bunch III was the founding director of the National Museum of African American History and Culture and is now President of the Smithsonian Institution.

The Guardian reports that “David Blight, a historian and close friend of Bunch, the Smithsonian’s secretary, said: “I haven’t talked to him yet. I’m sure he’s trying to decide what to do. I hope he doesn’t resign but that’s probably what they want. They want the leadership of the Smithsonian, the directors of these museums, to resign so they can replace them.'”

“Blight, who is the current president of the Organization of American Historians, was ‘appalled, angry, frustrated but not fully surprised”, when he read the executive order. ‘There have been plenty of other executive orders but this is a frontal assault,’ he said. ‘I read it as basically a declaration of war on American historians and curators and on the Smithsonian,'” according to The Guardian. “‘What’s most appalling about this is the arrogance, or worse, the audacity to assume that the executive branch of government, the presidency, can simply dictate to American historians writ large the nature of doing history and its content.'”

David Blight is correct to point out that “I take it as an insult, an affront and an attempt to control what we do as historians. On the one hand this kind of executive order is so absurd that a lot of people in my field laugh at it. It’s a laughable thing until you realise what their intent actually is and what they’re doing is trying to first erode and then obliterate what we’ve been writing for a century.”

Trump’s executive order is also linked with broader authoritarian aims of altering and controlling historical records in the libraries and archives of the United States by withholding funds and dismantling the Institute for Museum and Library Services (IMLS).

The Trump administration and its DOGE team are currently dismantling the Department of Education and disrupting educational grants. The Trump administration is attempting to influence educational curricula in universities, colleges, and high schools across the nation by withholding research grants and educational funds.

Posted in Academic Freedom, Education Policy, Higher Education, History of Race and Racism, Human Rights, Humanities Education, Museums and Historical Memory, Political Culture, Political History of the United States, United States History and Society | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Foreign Affairs Virtual Graduate Fair

Foreign Affairs, a leading academic journal on international relations, is hosting a Virtual Graduate Fair for prospective graduate students in international affairs.

Here is the announcement from Foreign Affairs:

Free to all prospective students, the Foreign Affairs Virtual Graduate School Fair will connect you directly with representatives at top programs in international affairs, public policy, diplomacy, and political science – all from the comfort of your home, office, phone, or tablet.

As a graduate school candidate, you have the ability to explore school program information and opportunities. Choose which schools you want to interact with and then engage in one-on-one text and video conversations directly with a representative at those institutions. Join us on April 2, 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. EST.

For more information and the registration link, see:

https://link.foreignaffairs.com/view/591db9302ddf9c3c420d2d98n9hux.8ah/a69c9a83

History students at Northern Illinois University who are interested in graduate studies are encouraged to check out this virtual graduate fair.

Posted in Careers in History, Civil-Military Relations, Graduate Work in History, international relations, Security Studies, Strategy and International Politics, United States Foreign Policy, War, Culture, and Society | Leave a comment

Unlawful Detentions of International Students in the U.S.

The Trump administration is deliberately targeting international students at universities across the country on the basis of their political speech.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have already unlawfully detained several international students who were legally in the United States on student visas in order to pursue studies at universities and colleges.

This is a gross violation of the free speech and right to assemble provisions of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and a terror tactic of a repressive police state.

“Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The New York Times rightly points out that “Lawful permanent residents are also protected by the Constitution, including free speech and due process rights, which could set up a major legal challenge. Lawyers for those whose student visas have been revoked have similarly challenged the administration on constitutional grounds.”

The revocation of visas and detentions also seem to be conducted without any due process, potentially violating the Fourth and Sixth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.

“The Trump administration is trying to deport pro-Palestinian students and academics who are legally in the United States, a new front in its clash with elite schools over what it says is their failure to combat antisemitism,” according to The New York Times.

“The White House asserts that these moves — many of which involve immigrants with visas and green cards — are necessary because those taken into custody threaten national security. But some legal experts say that the administration is trampling on free speech rights and using lower-level laws to crack down on activism.”

The New York Times reports that “Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that the State Department under his direction had revoked the visas of roughly 300 people and was continuing to revoke visas daily. He did not specify how many of those people had taken part in campus protests or acted to support Palestinians but said ‘there’s a lot of them now.'”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is actively and willfully directing this unconstitutional policy and has sought to justify his actions with statements to the news media.

“Immigration officials are known to have pursued at least nine people in apparent connection to this effort since the start of March.”

This policy is unconstitutional and an abuse of power by Secretary of State and the Department of Homeland Security.

The outrageous policy also violates the principle of academic freedom, which are long-standing norms in the United States, even if not rooted in the U.S. Constitution.

Selig, Kate. “What We Know About the Detentions of Student Protesters.” The New York Times (27 March 2025).

The New York Times has also published video of ICE’s detention of Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish student at Tufts University.

Posted in Academic Freedom, Civil Rights Issues, Education Policy, Higher Education, Human Rights, Political Activism and Protest Culture, Political History of the United States, United States History and Society | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Aix-Marseille Université and Safe Place for Science

“Just hours after opening its new program for American researchers called Safe Place for Science in reaction to Trump administration policies, Aix Marseille University received its first application,” according to The New York Times.

“Since then, the university, which is in the south of France and is known for its science programs, has received about a dozen applications per day from what the school considers ‘scientific asylum’ seekers.”

I was actually in Marseille for an academic workshop when the university launched its Safe Place for Science program and witnessed the French and international responses to it.

The workshop in Marseille was focused on Guerres de Religion et Changement Climatique (Religious Wars and Climate Change). Jérémie Foa, Maître de Conférences HDR (Aix-Marseille Université and TELEMMe), and I had organized this workshop during the preceding months and it was successfully held on 11 March at the Institute for Advanced Study of Aix-Marseille Université (IMéRA).

The IMéRA is an interdisciplinary research institute based on the model of the famous Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, New Jersey. The IMéRA is part of a French network of research institutes and the broader EURIAS network of research institutes across the European Union.

Jérémie Foa and I are currently collaborating on the connections between religious conflict and climate change in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, a period associated with the so-called Little Ice Age, when severe cooling shortened growing seasons and disrupted crop growth, producing famines and social crises across the northern hemisphere. Unfortunately, the themes of climate change and climate history would be impossible to get federal research funding for now in the United States. After our successful workshop, we hope to organize a larger conference in Marseille next year, also to be held at the IMéRA.

As a professor from an American university who was already in Marseille when the Safe for Science Program launched, I was invited to participate in discussions at Aix-Marseille Université of the impact of current Trump administration actions targeting research institutions, research funding, and higher education in the United States.

I have already written a detailed post (see below) about the discussions in Marseille and French news organizations’ coverage of the launch of the Safe for Science Program and the press conference held in Marseille.

Two weeks later, The New York Times and other news media in the United States are now starting to report on the “brain drain” of researchers from the United States toward Europe.

“Other universities in France and elsewhere in Europe have also rushed to save American researchers fleeing drastic cuts to jobs and programs by the Trump administration, as well as perceived attacks on whole fields of research.”

The New York Times emphasizes that “at stake are not just individual jobs, but the concept of free scientific inquiry, university presidents say. They are also rushing to fill huge holes in collective research caused by the cuts, particularly in areas targeted by the Trump administration, including studies of climate change, public health, environmental science, gender and diversity.”

Porter, Catherine. “As Trump’s Policies Worry Scientists, France and Others Put Out a Welcome Mat.” The New York Times (25 March 2025).

On Aix-Marseille Université’s Safe Place for Science Program and the French and European response to it, see my previous post on Attack on U.S. Research and Education: French Views.

On the workshop on Guerres de Religion et Changement Climatique held a the IMéRA, see my previous post on Religious Wars and Climate Change.

The IMéRA webpage and the Safe Place for Science Program webpage are at the Aix-Marseille Université website.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Secretary of Defense Texted Detailed Attack Plans

Tulsi Gabbard (Director of National Intelligence) and John Ratcliffe (Director of the Central Intelligence Agency) testified yesterday to the Senate Intelligence Committee that there were no classified details in the text communications in the Signal group formed by Michael Waltz (National Security Advisor).

Pete Hegseth (Secretary of Defense) and other Trump administration officials who were involved in this Signal group claimed yesterday on national television that no classified information had been exchanged and that national security interests were not harmed. Hegseth claimed: “Nobody was texting war plans. And that’s all I have to say about that.”

Michael Waltz wrote in response on X: “No locations. No sources & methods. NO WAR PLANS. Foreign partners had already been notified that strikes were imminent. BOTTOM LINE: President Trump is protecting America and our interests.”

They lied.

The Atlantic has now published additional texts from the Signal group that reveal the details of the military operations and tactics that senior Trump administration officials discussed via text messages on a commercial platform. Here is some key exchanges from the longer thread, as published by The Atlantic today:

Trump officials have absolutely no plausible deniability here. They openly discussed detailed attack plans via text messages with a journalist that they accidentally included in their Signal group. This reckless conduct exposed U.S. military operations in real time and undermined U.S. national security.

When Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic revealed the Trump officials’ serious errors, many of them lied and attempted to discredit the journalist and his news magazine.

Michael Waltz, Pete Hegseth, and other Trump officials involved in the Signal group must now resign over their blatant recklessness in discussing military operations via text message on an unsecured platform.

They should also be investigated for potentially criminal conduct under the Espionage Act.

Tulsi Gabbard and John Ratcliffe who lied under oath to the Senate Intelligence Committee yesterday must also resign.

Historians of war and society are following the developing story on the breach of national security with dismay. This incident shows a serious erosion in civil-military relations and national security institutions within the United States.

As an academic historian of war and society and a longtime member of the Society for Military History, I deplore the reckless conduct of the National Security Advisor, Secretary of Defense, and other senior members of the Trump administration who clearly do not have sufficient experience or ethical responsibility to be involved in military policy discussions, much less leading military policy.

This post has been updated to include additional sources.

Goldberg, Jeffrey and Shane Harris. “Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisers Shared on Signal.” The Atlantic (26 March 2025).

Bazail-Eimil, Eric. “The Atlantic Releases Screenshots of Timing, Weapons Used in Yemen War Plans Signal Chat.” Politico (26 March 2025).

“The Leaked Signal Chat, Annotated.” The New York Times (26 March 2025).

Posted in Civil-Military Relations, History of News, Information Management, Maritime History, Political History of the United States, Security Studies, Strategy and International Politics, United States Foreign Policy, United States History and Society, War, Culture, and Society | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Elite Universities Should Resist

“President Trump has declared that this country’s leading universities are sites of ‘anti-American insanity.’ He has tried to cut their funding for scientific research. His administration has announced investigations into diversity programs and floated new taxes on university endowments. Brown and Columbia have had faculty members or former students detained and threatened with deportation. On Thursday the administration suspended $175 million of funding to the University of Pennsylvania over its policies on transgender athletes,” according an opinion essay published yesterday in The New York Times.

Charlie Eaton, Associate Professor of Sociology (University of California, Merced), comments that “fearing sanction or retribution, universities have begun to placate the administration, banning diversity statements in faculty hiring or weighing whether to strip trigger words like “diverse” from their hospital systems’ websites. In doing so, they risk abandoning their roles as centers of free speech and critical debate in the name of appeasement.”

Eaton argues that “top universities must instead exercise the financial independence afforded by their endowments, which are commonly valued in the tens of billions. Their leaders should collectively declare they will not suppress lawful free speech, diversity programs or campus research to appease any president. The wealthiest universities, in particular, must pledge to use all available endowment funds as a backstop for any federal funding cuts to research, educational programs or student financial aid at their schools, barring any donor restrictions. Endowments could even fund legal defense for students and scholars who are threatened with deportation.”

“Thus far, university presidents have largely kept their heads down instead of uniting to oppose Mr. Trump’s assault. That is a mistake. A key authoritarian strategy is to single out prominent individuals or institutions for repression so that others, afraid, forgo legitimate criticism of the authoritarian leader. Often universities are some of the first institutions that authoritarians attack. Make no mistake: The Trump administration’s punitive cuts to federal research grants and detention of university students or faculty members, couched in the president’s grievances over diversity programs and campus protests, are early signs of this strategy at work in America.”

State universities and liberal arts colleges often have small endowments, so they do not have the same ability to resist federal government threats and defend academic freedom.

So, Charlie Eaton is correct that elite private universities and flagship state universities need to play a leadership role for higher education institutions in resisting the many unconstitutional and illegal actions instigated by the Trump administration and the so-called DOGE team.

Eaton, Charlie. “$15 Billion Is Enough to Fight a President.” The New York Times (25 March 2025).

Posted in Academic Freedom, Current Research, Education Policy, Higher Education, Human Rights, Humanities Education, Political History of the United States, United States History and Society | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Trump Officials Breached National Security Protocols

High-ranking Trump administration officials seem to have committed a severe breach of U.S. national security protocols by sharing United States military plans over an internet app. In doing so, they have potentially violated the Espionage Act.

Jeffrey Goldberg, Editor of The Atlantic, reports that “U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling.”

Goldberg reports that he received a Signal contact request from someone claiming to be Michael Waltz, President Donald Trump’s National Security Adviser. This contact led to Goldberg’s inclusion in a Signal group in which included Vice President Vance, Defense Secretary Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Presidential Advisor Miller, and other national security officials in the Trump administration.

These high-ranking Trump administration members allegedly used this Signal group to discuss national security issues and detailed military plans to bomb the Houthis in Yeman, as well as the motives for, justification of, and timing of the attacks.

Goldberg indicates that “I have never seen a breach quite like this. It is not uncommon for national-security officials to communicate on Signal. But the app is used primarily for meeting planning and other logistical matters—not for detailed and highly confidential discussions of a pending military action. And, of course, I’ve never heard of an instance in which a journalist has been invited to such a discussion.”

“Conceivably, Waltz, by coordinating a national-security-related action over Signal, may have violated several provisions of the Espionage Act, which governs the handling of ‘national defense’ information, according to several national-security lawyers interviewed by my colleague Shane Harris for this story. Harris asked them to consider a hypothetical scenario in which a senior U.S. official creates a Signal thread for the express purpose of sharing information with Cabinet officials about an active military operation. He did not show them the actual Signal messages or tell them specifically what had occurred,” according to Goldberg.

“All of these lawyers said that a U.S. official should not establish a Signal thread in the first place. Information about an active operation would presumably fit the law’s definition of ‘national defense’ information, according to Goldberg. “The Signal app is not approved by the government for sharing classified information. The government has its own systems for that purpose. If officials want to discuss military activity, they should go into a specially designed space known as a sensitive compartmented information facility, or SCIF—most Cabinet-level national-security officials have one installed in their home—or communicate only on approved government equipment, the lawyers said. Normally, cellphones are not permitted inside a SCIF, which suggests that as these officials were sharing information about an active military operation, they could have been moving around in public. Had they lost their phones, or had they been stolen, the potential risk to national security would have been severe.”

Jeffrey Goldberg concludes that “Waltz and the other Cabinet-level officials were already potentially violating government policy and the law simply by texting one another about the operation. But when Waltz added a journalist—presumably by mistake—to his principals committee, he created new security and legal issues. Now the group was transmitting information to someone not authorized to receive it. That is the classic definition of a leak, even if it was unintentional, and even if the recipient of the leak did not actually believe it was a leak until Yemen came under American attack.”

This severe security breach clearly warrants both FBI investigation and Congressional hearings.

Historians of war and society and of U.S. national security issues will be following this developing story closely. I will be eager to see how professors and researchers in the Society for Military History respond to this news.

U.S. Representatives and Senators are now responding to the news of these shocking leaks.

“‘I am horrified by reports that our most senior national security officials, including the heads of multiple agencies, shared sensitive and almost certainly classified information via a commercial messaging application, including imminent war plans,’ Democratic Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement,” according to Foreign Policy.

“‘If true, these actions are a brazen violation of laws and regulations that exist to protect national security, including the safety of Americans serving in harm’s way,’ Himes added.”

“Himes emphasized the ‘calamitous risks of transmitting classified information across unclassified systems’ and said he intended to get answers from intelligence officials at a committee hearing scheduled for Wednesday.”

Foreign Policy reports that “Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the ranking member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, in a statement called for an immediate hearing on ‘what might be the most astonishing breach of our national security in recent history, where top leadership from DOD, State, Treasury, the CIA and even the VP himself used a commercial messaging app—Signal—to communicate U.S. war plans, all the while unaware that a journalist was included in the group chat.'”

“Meeks said that Republicans have ‘regularly contrived security ‘scandals’ to attack their political opponents with years of nakedly partisan hearings and investigations,’ adding that the Trump administration ‘proves yet again that hypocrisy and cynical politics aren’t the only defining characteristics of today’s GOP; rank incompetence is front and center.'”

“Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee, in a post on X decried the administration’s reported actions as ‘blatantly illegal and dangerous beyond belief,'” according to Foreign Policy.

“‘Our national security is in the hands of complete amateurs,’ Warren wrote. ‘What other highly sensitive national security conversations are happening over group chat? Any other random people accidentally added to those, too?'”

Goldberg, Jeffrey. “The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans.” The Atlantic (24 March 2025).

Haltiwanger, John. “‘Horrified’: Trump Cabinet Accidentally Leaking War Plans Prompts Alarm in Washington.” Foreign Policy (24 March 2025).

Cooper, Helen and Eric Schmitt. “Hegseth Disclosed Secret War Plans in a Group Chat.” The New York Times (24 March 2025).

For broader context on the Red Sea situation, see:

Froman, Michael. “The Siege of the Red Sea.” Council on Foreign Relations (21 March 2025).

Note: This post has been updated with additional sources.

Posted in Civil-Military Relations, Information Management, Legal history, Political Culture, Security Studies, Strategy and International Politics, United States Foreign Policy, United States History and Society, War, Culture, and Society | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Renaissance Society of America Conference in Boston

I participated in the Renaissance Society of America Conference in Boston over the extended weekend.

I enjoyed participating in a panel on “Piracy and Privateering in the Early Modern Mediterranean.”

I gave a paper on Marseille as a base for maritime violence and slave-taking in a Michael Martoccio (University of Wisconsin at Madison) presented his latest research on maritime violence in Genoa and the ceremonial, logistical, and legal aspects of the organization of the port facilities there. Ali Atabey (University of Texas at San Antonio) discussed Ottoman enslaved persons and their experiences of ransoming and reintegration (or not!) into Ottoman society. The panel was absolutely fascinating!

I also chaired a session on “Gender, Households, and Homicide in Europe, 1450-1700.” Mireille Juliette Pardon presented on complicity in Flemish homicide cases from the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. Sara Beam’s paper focused on judicial violence and prosecution of homicide in sixteenth-century Geneva. Amanda Grace Madden offered a paper on gender and violence in domestic spaces in early modern Venice. The session was well attended and had a robust discussion.

I attended numerous panels at the conference and heard presentations of the latest research on Renaissance studies. I learned about Renaissance art, architecture, ceremonies, literature, theater, Medici princely rule, Niccolò Machiavelli’s model for militias, Michel de Montaigne’s essay writing, the ducal armory in Venice, Mediterranean slavery, maritime commerce and the circulation of goods, anatomical theaters, history of science, sensory perceptions, gardens, print culture, and other topics.

In addition, I got to see lots of Renaissance studies friends and colleagues over coffee breaks, lunches, receptions, and dinners.

All in all, a great conference!

Posted in Conferences, Cultural History, Current Research, Early Modern Europe, Early Modern World, European History, History of Science, History of the Book, History of Violence, Mediterranean World, Militias and Paramilitaries, Renaissance Art and History, Warfare in the Early Modern World, Women and Gender History | Leave a comment

On the Occupation of the U.S. Institute of Peace

Elon Musk’s so-called DOGE unit has occupied the U.S. Institute of Peace, an independent research institute established by the United States Congress.

The U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) is one of the leading non-profit research institutes for peace studies in the world.

When USIP leaders and staff denied DOGE entry to their building, DOGE called in Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police to force their way into the institute’s building.

“For nearly five hours last Monday, Elon Musk’s government cost-cutting team joined with private security and with law enforcement authorities for an extraordinary showdown at an iconic building alongside the National Mall,” according to The New York Times.

“They were demanding access to the U.S. Institute of Peace. The group, a nonprofit created by Congress 41 years ago, supports diplomatic solutions to global conflicts, but on this day it became the hub of a bitter dispute with implications for U.S. constitutional law.”

The New York Times reports that “the confrontation stemmed from the White House’s decision this month to orchestrate the ouster of the institute’s president and top staff. When they refused to leave, a State Department official, alongside Mr. Musk’s team, the Department of Government Efficiency, moved to take control. By the end of the night, the office was occupied by new staff and a president backed by the Trump administration.”

NPR reports that a judge failed to reverse DOGE’s occupation of the U.S. Institute of Peace. Meanwhile, the United States Institute of Peace website has been taken down, presumably by DOGE.

As a historian of peace and conflict studies, I deplore the illegal and anti-constitutional occupation of the U.S. Institute of Peace.

Kavi, Aishvarya. “Showdown at the Institute of Peace.” The New York Times (24 March 2025).

Feng, Emily and Ryan Lucas. “Judge Declines to Immediately Reverse Trump moves at U.S. Institute of Peace.” NPR (19 March 2025).

“Doge Occupies US Institute of Peace Headquarters after White House Guts its Board.” The Guardian (17 March 2025).

Posted in Academic Freedom, Civil Rights Issues, Higher Education, Human Rights, Humanities Education, Peacemaking Processes, Political History of the United States, Public History, Security Studies, United States History and Society | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

AFT and AAUP Defend the Department of Education

The American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), and two public school districts in the state of Massachusetts have filed a lawsuit to block the Trump administration’s attempts to dismantle the Department of Education.

The United Faculty Alliance (UFA), my faculty union at Northern Illinois University, is affiliated with the AFT and the AAUP and I support their lawsuit.

“The Trump administration’s campaign to dismantle the Education Department drew a court challenge on Monday, as opponents called the plan an attempt to evade congressional authority.

“The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Massachusetts by the American Federation of Teachers, the American Association of University Professors and a pair of public school districts in Massachusetts. It comes four days after President Trump signed an executive order that directed the education secretary, Linda McMahon, to ‘take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the department.’

“The day after the order, Mr. Trump announced that the Small Business Administration would assume control of the government’s $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio, and that the Health and Human Services Department would oversee nutrition programs and special education services.

“The Education Department, created in 1979, cannot be closed without Congress’s consent. The lawsuit argues that moves by the Trump administration since it came to power in January, including an effort to roughly halve the department’s work force, ‘will interfere with the department’s ability to carry out its statutorily required functions.’

“Ilana Krepchin, chairwoman of the Somerville, Mass., school committee, which is a plaintiff in the case, said that the Education Department is a ‘cornerstone of equitable public education.’

“‘Dismantling it would cause real harm — not only to our students and schools, but to communities across the country,’ Ms. Krepchin said.”

Blinder, Alan and Michael C. Bender, “Trump Administration Is Sued Over Push to Shut Education Department.” The New York Times (24 March 2025).

For more information on the lawsuit, see the AFT and AAUP websites.

Posted in Academic Freedom, Education Policy, Higher Education, Human Rights, Humanities Education, Legal history, Political Culture, United States History and Society | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment